I write frequently of trees, and grass and flowers and oceans. But my roots are in cities, and it is cities that complete my mental landscapes like no other geography can.
Excerpts from books about two of my favorites, New York and Bombay follow. The books also happen to be some of the best writing I’ve read recently, and Shadow Cities, in particular, is a masterpiece on so many levels.
(The books: Shadow Cities, by Andre Aciman, and Shantaram, by Gregory David Roberts)
From Shadow Cities:
Some people bring exile with them the way they bring it upon themselves wherever they go. (..) An exile reads change the way he reads time, memory, self, love, fear, beauty: in the key of loss.
It is difficult to explain what seclusion means when you find it on an island in the middle of Broadway, amid the roar of midday traffic.
Perhaps what lay beyond the trees was not the end of Manhattan, or even Paris, but the beginnings of another, unknown city, the real city, the one that always beckons, the one we invent each time and may never see and fear we’ve begun to forget.
Sometimes finding you are lost where you were lost last year can be oddly reassuring, almost familiar. You may never find yourself; but you do remember looking for yourself. That too can be reassuring, comforting.
Here I would come to remember not so much the beauty of the past as the beauty of remembering, realizing that just because we love to look back doesn’t mean we love the things we look back on.
(..) all these people and all these layers upon layers of histories, warmed-over memories, and overdrawn fantasies should forever go into letting my Straus Park, with its Parisian Frankfurts and Roman Londons, remain forever a tiny, artificial speck on the map of the world that is my center of gravity, from which radiates every road I’ve traveled, and to which I always long to return when I am away.
And a few from Shantaram:
They knew the place in me where the river stopped, and they marked it with a new name. Shantaram Kishan Kharre. I don't know if they found that name in the heart of the man they believed me to be, or if they planted it there, like a wishing tree, to bloom and grow.
I don’t know what frightens me more, the power that crushes us, or our endless ability to endure it.
Every work of art is in some way an act of forgiveness.
One of the ironies of courage and why we prize it so highly, is that we find it easier to be brave for somone else than we do for ourselves alone
The past reflects eternally between two mirrors -the bright mirror of words and deeds, and the dark one, full of things we didn't do or say.
If fate doesn't make you laugh, you just don't get the joke.
Men reveal what they think when they look away, and what they feel when they hesitate. With women, it’s the other way around.
It's a fact of life on the run that you often love more people than you trust. For people in the safe world, of course, exactly the opposite is true.
What characterizes the human race more, cruelty, or the capacity to feel shame for it?
Sometimes you break your heart in the right way.
Wisdom is just cleverness, with all the guts kicked out of it.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Tipping points
A familiar point of amusement for me is the three phases my relationships go through. Most of my friends are people I like instantly and deeply, within a few minutes of meeting them. I go through an initial stage of near-infatuation, where we have long conversations that linger in my mind and the person can do no wrong. On several occasions, I have fought with family and others to defend my friends and their actions. Following this, there's a phase where I find the person incredibly predictable and equally annoying- when I experience something (something I read, or a movie, or whatever else) I know EXACTLY how they will respond. And everything they do irks me.
Beyond this, there is an 'acceptance zone' where people fall in at various levels, a zone where I continue to love them but stop being irritated. I can accept their actions and behaviors as part of who they are and no longer feel the need to judge them by my standards. I like to think these zones are not obvious to my friends unless I mention them- the irritation is as unintended and inexplicable to me as the affection, and though the former passes, the latter persists through the course of these moods of mine. If I wanted to make this sound grander than I think it is, I would probably describe this equilibrium I reach as the point where my heart and brain come together in a relationship- I love, and I judge, and finally reach a phase where I can justify each to the other. (Why do I love this person and spend so much time/conversation/etc. on them? Why do I judge this person unless I care about them?)
The length of the first two phases varies- I remain infatuated with some people longer, make my peace with some sooner than others. But in every case through most of my life, I can mark off the three periods distinctly. I wonder if this is typical? (since of course, this isn't something I discuss with most friends, nor intend to!)
And in a parallel mood, I wonder if my sense of my surroundings is reaching this phase of acceptance as well. First, I couldn't get enough of being an independent adult. Then, I longed for the simplicity and security of childhood, as I (metaphorically!!) held up every cleaning rag and electricity bill and vacation plan to the light of childhood happiness asking, "Really, is this all there is to growing up?" Now, after constantly reacting to nearly everything I encounter, my body and mind are learning to fall into an equilibrium where I can move through my days with ease, and less need to evaluate each move and decision.
Beyond this, there is an 'acceptance zone' where people fall in at various levels, a zone where I continue to love them but stop being irritated. I can accept their actions and behaviors as part of who they are and no longer feel the need to judge them by my standards. I like to think these zones are not obvious to my friends unless I mention them- the irritation is as unintended and inexplicable to me as the affection, and though the former passes, the latter persists through the course of these moods of mine. If I wanted to make this sound grander than I think it is, I would probably describe this equilibrium I reach as the point where my heart and brain come together in a relationship- I love, and I judge, and finally reach a phase where I can justify each to the other. (Why do I love this person and spend so much time/conversation/etc. on them? Why do I judge this person unless I care about them?)
The length of the first two phases varies- I remain infatuated with some people longer, make my peace with some sooner than others. But in every case through most of my life, I can mark off the three periods distinctly. I wonder if this is typical? (since of course, this isn't something I discuss with most friends, nor intend to!)
And in a parallel mood, I wonder if my sense of my surroundings is reaching this phase of acceptance as well. First, I couldn't get enough of being an independent adult. Then, I longed for the simplicity and security of childhood, as I (metaphorically!!) held up every cleaning rag and electricity bill and vacation plan to the light of childhood happiness asking, "Really, is this all there is to growing up?" Now, after constantly reacting to nearly everything I encounter, my body and mind are learning to fall into an equilibrium where I can move through my days with ease, and less need to evaluate each move and decision.
Monday, July 18, 2011
Two reviews
A self-absorbed prologue (skip down if you only want reviews ;)):
I rarely write reviews, here or elsewhere. It takes more immediate thought and depth of perception than I am willing to spare for most of what I come across. I like talking about books and movies, but that is about all. Beyond that, I cannot summarize what I read nor answer the question “What are you reading lately?” with a simple title or two. It is easier to say what I am remembering, what words from books or movies or songs I stumbled over previously are most resonant with my present. Two recent encounters led me to write this down, though, and so, here goes:
Not quite magic
Perhaps obviously, the last Harry Potter movie. Perhaps equally obviously, I didn’t like it very much. None of the movies lived up to my connections with the books, though I could never quite put my finger on why as precisely as I could with this last film.
As the better part of two hours flew past on the wings of albino dragons and suits of armor coming alive, the finale was met only with an insipid, not quite heartfelt, “Does it hurt to die?” In my imagination, this is the point where the 17 year old turns to childhood once more and resurrected ghosts offer more solidity than the giant trees that surround him, where the man who has done more than most ever dream of is faced with the last great fear common to Muggle and Wizard alike. On the screen, I see a marginally annoying teenager displaying neither emotion nor much else.
I didn’t quite "grow up" with Harry Potter, reading the first book when I was 15 and the rest along the way. But like my connection with books I particularly love, I remember each encounter like a meeting with a loved set of friends, and could blabber endlessly about personal connections with each one, how I stumbled across the books before most people had even heard of them(Imagine a time when you could walk into a bookstore and ask for the third HP book and be met with “Huh?”)and much more.
Most importantly, like so many other kids/adults fumbling through life, I’ve practiced the spells with Harry and Hermione and the rest. I’ve cast personal Patronus spells at anxious interviews and Riddikulus-ed away nightmares in the dark. I have learned that to use an unforgivable curse, you must mean it, that to transform a mouse into a teacup you must be able to visualize it first.
The books, you see, were never about the magic alone. They were as much about allegory and myth and growing up and finding strength as they were about learning to cast a powerful spell. The real magic was the people in the stories, not the things they did. And the movie, though well-made for a film, fails to capture that. The movie is about the fireworks and the effects, not the maturing of character and subtleties that captured my heart the first time around. It’s like licking the icing off a cake. Though I won’t say no to the icing, I prefer savoring the layers.
Magically real
And secondly, am I the last person to be reading Shantaram? I tend to avoid over-hyped books, especially when they are ‘sold’ to me by eager wannabe intellectualists over late-night bar conversations. And biased as I am in my views, I tend to be wary of books about India. But this- it is rich and layered and magical and familiar, Bombay in my eyes as I read his words. Street-smells rise off the pages and I almost feel the rickety bus and the weight of my bags as I hold them tight. Colaba streets and night-time by the Arabian sea and the ease with which the words flow. The humor reminds me of the cleverness I love about Salman Rushdie, every few lines I come across a turn of phrase or a sentence that makes me want to grab the words out and wave them on a banner that shouts, “Look at this!” and the love that seeps through the words keeps me turning the pages. Even only a few chapters in, I am hooked. And even if the rest of the book disappoints, this I would come back to.
I rarely write reviews, here or elsewhere. It takes more immediate thought and depth of perception than I am willing to spare for most of what I come across. I like talking about books and movies, but that is about all. Beyond that, I cannot summarize what I read nor answer the question “What are you reading lately?” with a simple title or two. It is easier to say what I am remembering, what words from books or movies or songs I stumbled over previously are most resonant with my present. Two recent encounters led me to write this down, though, and so, here goes:
Not quite magic
Perhaps obviously, the last Harry Potter movie. Perhaps equally obviously, I didn’t like it very much. None of the movies lived up to my connections with the books, though I could never quite put my finger on why as precisely as I could with this last film.
As the better part of two hours flew past on the wings of albino dragons and suits of armor coming alive, the finale was met only with an insipid, not quite heartfelt, “Does it hurt to die?” In my imagination, this is the point where the 17 year old turns to childhood once more and resurrected ghosts offer more solidity than the giant trees that surround him, where the man who has done more than most ever dream of is faced with the last great fear common to Muggle and Wizard alike. On the screen, I see a marginally annoying teenager displaying neither emotion nor much else.
I didn’t quite "grow up" with Harry Potter, reading the first book when I was 15 and the rest along the way. But like my connection with books I particularly love, I remember each encounter like a meeting with a loved set of friends, and could blabber endlessly about personal connections with each one, how I stumbled across the books before most people had even heard of them(Imagine a time when you could walk into a bookstore and ask for the third HP book and be met with “Huh?”)and much more.
Most importantly, like so many other kids/adults fumbling through life, I’ve practiced the spells with Harry and Hermione and the rest. I’ve cast personal Patronus spells at anxious interviews and Riddikulus-ed away nightmares in the dark. I have learned that to use an unforgivable curse, you must mean it, that to transform a mouse into a teacup you must be able to visualize it first.
The books, you see, were never about the magic alone. They were as much about allegory and myth and growing up and finding strength as they were about learning to cast a powerful spell. The real magic was the people in the stories, not the things they did. And the movie, though well-made for a film, fails to capture that. The movie is about the fireworks and the effects, not the maturing of character and subtleties that captured my heart the first time around. It’s like licking the icing off a cake. Though I won’t say no to the icing, I prefer savoring the layers.
Magically real
And secondly, am I the last person to be reading Shantaram? I tend to avoid over-hyped books, especially when they are ‘sold’ to me by eager wannabe intellectualists over late-night bar conversations. And biased as I am in my views, I tend to be wary of books about India. But this- it is rich and layered and magical and familiar, Bombay in my eyes as I read his words. Street-smells rise off the pages and I almost feel the rickety bus and the weight of my bags as I hold them tight. Colaba streets and night-time by the Arabian sea and the ease with which the words flow. The humor reminds me of the cleverness I love about Salman Rushdie, every few lines I come across a turn of phrase or a sentence that makes me want to grab the words out and wave them on a banner that shouts, “Look at this!” and the love that seeps through the words keeps me turning the pages. Even only a few chapters in, I am hooked. And even if the rest of the book disappoints, this I would come back to.
Thursday, July 07, 2011
An explanation
Saying a well thought-out "no" is perhaps one of the most empowering acts possible. It takes introspection and deep thought and much courage. Despite my tendency to optimism, I believe the capacity to refuse something is just as essential and important as the ability to say yes. This implies, of course, a certain degree of self-realization and maturity in the person involved. The refusal I refer to is not the childish tantrum of a toddler refusing his green peas, nor the denial of the eternal pessimist who believes nothing is possible.
No is the stand of a person who has seen two paths and made a choice. It is not an thoughtless process- "here I am, let me pick one and see where it goes. Why think about this?", nor is it the un-choice of the person who drifts with the tide, "Yeah, let me just see where life takes me, maybe it will work out." No is the choice of the teenager to stand up to peer pressure. It is the refusal of a person to take on more work to keep everyone around happy. It is the stand of the woman who is not afraid to take time for herself away from her family. It is the choice of the person who refuses to bend to circumstance just because it exists.
Just as important as voicing the refusal is enabling another to voice it. Perhaps the parent who has raised a child capable of saying no is a better person to explain this. In my mind, raising someone to a level of self-awareness where they have both the knowledge and strength to refuse something is an act of power. This is not always welcome, of course, since any extreme growth comes with pain. And even if the refusal is directed at the parent/ teacher, there must be, somewhere, some measure of pride that they have raised a human being who knows their mind and is unafraid to use it.
And yet a refusal rarely makes sense to the person on the receiving end. "Why must I go through this pain and this struggle?" asks the hurt voice. If there is a purpose, perhaps it is this. This was never about you. You were meant to teach someone else something about themselves, give them a degree of knowledge and strength they did not have before they met you.
No is the stand of a person who has seen two paths and made a choice. It is not an thoughtless process- "here I am, let me pick one and see where it goes. Why think about this?", nor is it the un-choice of the person who drifts with the tide, "Yeah, let me just see where life takes me, maybe it will work out." No is the choice of the teenager to stand up to peer pressure. It is the refusal of a person to take on more work to keep everyone around happy. It is the stand of the woman who is not afraid to take time for herself away from her family. It is the choice of the person who refuses to bend to circumstance just because it exists.
Just as important as voicing the refusal is enabling another to voice it. Perhaps the parent who has raised a child capable of saying no is a better person to explain this. In my mind, raising someone to a level of self-awareness where they have both the knowledge and strength to refuse something is an act of power. This is not always welcome, of course, since any extreme growth comes with pain. And even if the refusal is directed at the parent/ teacher, there must be, somewhere, some measure of pride that they have raised a human being who knows their mind and is unafraid to use it.
And yet a refusal rarely makes sense to the person on the receiving end. "Why must I go through this pain and this struggle?" asks the hurt voice. If there is a purpose, perhaps it is this. This was never about you. You were meant to teach someone else something about themselves, give them a degree of knowledge and strength they did not have before they met you.
Tuesday, July 05, 2011
Logical progression?
:Tell me the way to the big city.
:Do you want to go there?
:I don't know. Give me the directions and then I will decide.
If the journey is all that matters, why set a destination? Enjoy the sights along whatever path you are on.
If you want to reach the big city, find a way to get there regardless of what the directions say.
Unsure of both desire to reach a destination and the means to reach it, one can rarely get anywhere.
:Do you want to go there?
:I don't know. Give me the directions and then I will decide.
If the journey is all that matters, why set a destination? Enjoy the sights along whatever path you are on.
If you want to reach the big city, find a way to get there regardless of what the directions say.
Unsure of both desire to reach a destination and the means to reach it, one can rarely get anywhere.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)